| 上一篇主題 :: 下一篇主題 |
| 發表人 |
內容 |
Y C Lai 二無王會員

註冊時間: 2007-01-05 文章: 376 來自: Hong Kong 2629 Master Points
|
發表於: 星期三 七月 14, 2010 2:27 pm 文章主題: % play when missing KJxx |
|
|
Hi,
Dummy = QT74
Hand = A9865
You have infinite entries. What is the best % play for taking 4 or more tricks? _________________ Jack Lai = Y C Lai |
|
| 回頂端 |
|
 |
Benjamin Yip 一梅花會員

註冊時間: 2007-08-19 文章: 21
165 Master Points
|
發表於: 星期三 七月 14, 2010 6:52 pm 文章主題: |
|
|
If your goal is 4 or 5 tricks:
Line A: Cash the Ace. Finesse the J if K drops.
If your goal is 5 tricks only:
you have an equivalent line
Line B: lead the Q to play Kxx onside
On expectation Line A yields more tricks (3.89).
So line A is dominate here. |
|
| 回頂端 |
|
 |
Michael Yuen 一紅心會員

註冊時間: 2007-01-10 文章: 65 來自: Macquarie University 826 Master Points
|
發表於: 星期四 七月 15, 2010 11:55 am 文章主題: |
|
|
What I learnt is that the correct play (goal 4 or 5 tricks) for this holding depends on the likeliness that LHO pops up the K with KX, KXX, KJX and KJXX
Weaker opps tend to pop up K more often, and this makes the line "small to T, then run Q finesse K" a better line to avoid losing 2 tricks.
If LHO plays the K whenever he has one. This line never loses 2 tricks.
If LHO plays correctly everytime he has the K. This line loses 2 tricks when J or Jx in RHO
While cash A then finesse J if K drops:
Loses 2 tricks when KJx or KJxx in RHO
But "small to T, then run Q finesse K" is a terrible MP line, it gives up all the 5 tricks possibility |
|
| 回頂端 |
|
 |
Abby Chiu 網主

註冊時間: 2006-10-27 文章: 393 來自: Hong Kong 2598 Master Points
|
|
| 回頂端 |
|
 |
|